TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Christine Briceño, Director of Human Resources
REPORT BY: Joy Cadiz, Staff Services Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Amending the Table and Index of Classes and the Departmental Allocation List for Information Technology Services
RECOMMENDATION
title
Adopt a Resolution to amend the Table and Index of Classes to add a new Information Security Analyst classification and amend the Departmental Allocation List for Information Technology Services, effective May 11, 2024, with no net increase of full-time equivalents. (Fiscal Impact: $26,200 annual expense; Information Technology Services Fund; Budgeted; Discretionary)
body
BACKGROUND
Human Resources received reclassification requests from two Senior Information Systems Specialists currently performing cybersecurity-related duties and determined that creating a new Information Security Analyst classification is appropriate for the duties being performed. Information Technology Services has evolved since the Senior Information Systems Specialist classification specification was written which did not contemplate the assigned functions. Human Resources notified the Napa Association of Public Employees of the new classification specification and associated salary range which met our obligation to provide the opportunity to meet and confer.
FISCAL & STRATEGIC PLAN IMPACT
|
Is there a Fiscal Impact? |
Yes |
|
Is it currently budgeted? |
Yes |
|
Where is it budgeted? |
42000-02 |
|
Is it Mandatory or Discretionary? |
Discretionary |
|
Discretionary Justification: |
The new Information Security Analyst classification ensures the incumbents are properly classified for the duties performed in an ever-evolving field. |
|
Is the general fund affected? |
No |
|
Future fiscal impact: |
The increased cost of salary and benefits for the remainder of the fiscal year is approximately $3,024. The annualized cost of salary and benefits is approximately $26,200 and will be budgeted for accordingly |
|
Consequences if not approved: |
Incumbents will continue working out of class and not appropriately compensated after the County arrived at a resolution to reclassification requests that properly reflects the duties performed by the incumbents. |
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed action is not a project as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations 15378 (State CEQA Guidelines) and therefore CEQA is not applicable.